Hotels and Hotel Chains, Culinary Art, Food and Beverage the one stop website for hoteliers
Global Job Network

 
Categories
Job Search
Hotel Chains
Hotel Directories
Associations
Magazines 
Books
Global Hotelier's Mail
Hoteliers' Forum
Marketing
Food & Beverage
Culinary 
Wine
Hotel Schools
Employment Agents
Consultants/Mgmt
Conventions/Events
Equipment/Supplies
Technology
Accounting/Finance
Brokers/Investments
Cool Links
Breaking News
News Archive
eHotelier Store
.


Newsletter - June 6, 2002

CEO SKETCHES OUT JONES LAND LASALLE’S STRATEGIC DIRECTION FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS

TWST Interview with Christopher Peacock, Jones Lang LaSalle  /  CHRISTOPHER A. PEACOCK is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Jones Lang LaSalle Inc.

TWST: Could we begin with a brief history of Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. (NYSE:JLL) and a broad overview of the company at the present time?

Mr. Peacock: Jones Lang LaSalle is the world’s leading fully integrated real estate services and investment management firm. Jones Lang LaSalle resulted from a merger of equals in March 1999 of LaSalle Partners Incorporated in America with Jones Lang Wootton, a London-based global firm.

TWST: Can you describe some of the services that you perform and tell us about the synergies that might exist among them?

Mr. Peacock: Our clients are the owners, occupiers and investors in real estate worldwide. The services that we provide cover four groups. First, for corporate occupiers of real estate, our Corporate Solutions services include space acquisition and disposition, facility management, strategic consulting and project and development services, which is the fit out of offices and other facilities. Our Investor Services includes buying, selling and leasing real estate, and property management. Project and development services (new construction and refurbishment) and strategic consulting are also services we provide for investors. We divide our financial services into a Capital Markets group and Investment Management. Our Capital Markets group handles acquisitions and dispositions of major portfolios, corporate finance, financial restructuring, sale and leasebacks, and debt and equity raising. Our global LaSalle Investment Management business manages in excess of $22 billion of capital across the world and provides clients with services in investment strategy, public and private markets, direct and indirect investments, and income growth and opportunistic programs.

TWST: Is there any other company that competes with you across those four sectors?

Mr. Peacock: No other single company can match us in all four sectors of business. A number of other real estate services companies offer similar services that our Corporate Solutions and Investor Services units provide. Our Capital Markets group often goes head to head with investment banks, and our investment management business competes with other global and regional fund management businesses. No other firm, we believe, has the broad spread and depth of capacity to serve client real estate needs in all these areas, nor do they enjoy some of our synergies. For example, our global investment management business, within the scope of its fiduciary responsibilities to clients, may use Jones Lang LaSalle to help source product, manage or fit it out and, in due course, sell it. The interplay among our Corporate Solutions, Investor Services and Capital Markets units is an important aspect of our service offering. So if a corporate occupier client owns a property that he or she may be interested in either a sale or leaseback or raising debt or equity for a building, our Capital Markets group will get involved for that transaction.

TWST: Could you sketch out your strategic direction for the next couple of years?

Mr. Peacock: I will begin with our simple, but bold vision for the firm. It is “To be the chosen real estate expert and strategic advisor to the leading owners, occupiers and investors around the world.” We have five overarching strategies: to exceed clients’ expectations; to deliver a recognized and differentiated brand; to develop a high-performance team culture; to achieve sustainable, profitable growth; and finally, to improve operational efficiency. Our strategies are specifically designed to respond to our objectives surrounding three key stakeholder groups — our clients, our people and our shareholders. For clients, we want to be their trusted advisors and a preferred business partner. For our people, we want to make Jones Lang LaSalle the best place to work in our industry, and for shareholders, we aim to deliver consistent, successful financial performance.

Three analysts and top management from eight sector firms examine the lodging sector in this special 47-page Lodging Industry issue from The Wall Street Transcript, available at (212/952-7433) or http://www.twst.com/info/info557.htm

WORLD SUMMIT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: BALI MEETING EXPECTED TO AVOID CONTROVERSY

Delegations at the forth Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) for the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Nusa Dua, Bali, from May 27 to June 7 try to avoid negotiating on controversial matters but to cooperate in order to find solutions to save the earth and mankind, Indonesia's State Minister for Environment Nabiel Makarim said Monday.

'The Chairman's Text of the PrepCom is so long and contains so many items. We hope we can focus on certain things in these days. We are all trying to avoid controversial topics, because the most important thing in this event is cooperation,' he said. He said the Kyoto Protocol on global warming for example, would be a major controversy among some negotiators, therefore such a topic should be avoided. 'The time is so limited, if we keep on arguing on the controversial things, we won't have much time left for cooperation,' he said. Bali is hosting the forth and final ministerial level meeting for the WSSD. There are various issues negotiated during the event including the impact of globalization, sustainable energy development, agriculture for food security, human settlements, changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns and human resources.

The two-week meeting is expecting to identify priorities, goals, constraints and actions in preparation for the Summit to be held in Johannesburg, South Africa, in August/September. The meeting in Bali is attended by senior officials and representatives from 189 countries and many international and local non- governmental organizations. Meanwhile, one of the priorities at the upcoming Summit in Johannesburg will be implementing measures to achieve sustainable development. Around 6,000 people from wide-ranging fields including governments, civil society organizations, the private sector and media attend in the event, reflecting the importance of issues related to the Earth. 

The global society faces ''an immense challenge ahead,'' in terms of access to safe water. Some 1.1 billion people lack access to safe water and 2.4 billion people lack adequate sanitation. Meanwhile, 2 billion people have no access to electricity and an additional 2 billion only have unreliable access to it. An important task is for people to try and change their patterns of behaviour regarding unsustainable natural resources use. In term of poverty eradication, especially in developing countries, there are people live on less than $1 per day. Eradicating poverty is the greatest global challenge in the world, which is also a main topic at the meeting in Bali.

Makarim said the last PrepCom meeting was expected to result three documents including political documents; list of action plans for a sustainable development and multilateral and bilateral agreements. 'Today we began the Senior Official Meetings, which will lead to the Ministerial Level meetings on June 5-7. We hope all things will be agreed. But constrains are still possible to happen in the draft for the global implementation document to be adopted at the Aug. 26 - Sept. 4 summit in Johannesburg,' he said. Three major things, which would potentially turn into constrains included good governance, financing and time table, he added.(I. Christianto)

Source: Access Bali Online

RECORD DECLINE IN 2001 HOTEL PROFITS, WORST IN OVER 60 YEARS; FALL-OFF TO CONTINUE IN 2002

The average U.S. hotel suffered a 19.4 percent decline in profits in 2001, according to the 2002 edition of Trends in the Hotel Industry-USA, published by PKF Consulting and the Hospitality Research Group (HRG).  PKF Consulting and HRG announced the availability of the latest annual Trends report today.

The downturn represents the first decline in hotel profitability since 1991, and the largest single-year drop recorded since 1938.  Given the firm's projections for a continued decline in hotel revenues in 2002, they estimate that the average U.S. hotel will be less profitable this year, as well.

The 2001 results come from the firm's recently completed annual Trends in the Hotel Industry survey, an annual review of U.S. hotel operations conducted since 1935.  This year's sample draws upon year-end 2001 financial statements from 3,737 hotels across the country.  Profits are defined as income after management fees, property taxes, and insurance, but before capital reserves, debt service, rent, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization.

"Going into 2001, we were projecting a modest 5.6 percent decline in hotel profits.  Clearly, the events of September 11 exaggerated the drop and contributed to the worst single year deterioration in hotel performance ever," says R. Mark Woodworth, Executive Managing Director of Atlanta-based HRG.  "In 2002, we continue to see hotels struggle to maintain their top line revenues, which will ultimately result in yet another year of falling profits."  Based on an estimate of flat occupancy, together with a 4.6 percent drop in average daily rates in 2002, HRG is projecting that the average U.S. hotel will suffer an 11.0 percent decline in operating profits for the year.  "While market conditions are expected to improve somewhat during the third and fourth quarters, the lodging industry has started out the year in a pretty deep hole," says Woodworth.

Performance Varies by Property Type

While all hotels suffered in 2001, the magnitude of decline in performance did vary by property type.  In general, those hotels with fewer rooms and lower room rates suffered less of a drop in revenues and profits than the larger, higher-rated properties.  Of all the different hotel categories, limited-service hotels experienced the smallest declines in revenues (5.4 percent) and profits (9.4 percent).  Convention hotels, on the other hand, endured the greatest fall-off in revenues (12.9 percent) and profits (24.3 percent).

"While profits have fallen for all property types, the average profit margin for the properties in our sample was 29.4 percent," says Woodworth.  "This is four percentage points greater than the 25.3 percent average margin achieved by US hotels from 1960 through 2000.  Hotel owners and operators certainly don't like to lose ground, but they are not losing money."
 

Change in Hotel Financial Performance
(PARA) 2000 to 2001

Property Type 

Revenues

Profits 

Profit Margin

Full-Service 

-10.6%

-21.5%

-12.2%

Limited-Service 

-5.4%

-9.4%

-4.2%

Resort

-8.4% 

-14.7%

-6.9%

All-Suite

-8.8%

-16.5%

-8.4%

Convention

-12.9%

-24.3%

-13.1%

All Hotels

-9.9%   

-19.4%  

-10.5%

Source: The Hospitality Research Group of PKF Consulting

Expenses Cut In Response

In response to falling revenues, US hotel managers did implement policies and procedures that reduced the average operating costs of the typical hotel by 5.2 percent.  Unfortunately, this is less than the 9.9 percent reduction in revenues.  Therefore, the average operating profit margin was lowered from 32.8 percent in 2000 to 29.4 percent in 2001.

"With payroll and related costs comprising 44.1 percent of all operating expenses at the typical US hotel, labor is one of the first costs that gets the attention of hotel management," says Woodworth.  In 2001, hotel managers were able to reduce their labor-related costs by 6.6 percent.  These savings were accomplished through a combination of salary cuts, reduced hours, and the elimination of jobs.  "Talking to operators, careful consideration was given to reducing or eliminating those positions that had the least direct effect on customer service."

Two expenses that appear to have been beyond the control of hotel management were utility costs and insurance premiums.  In 2001, utility costs increased 7.0 percent, while insurance payments grew a staggering 18.9 percent.  "Given all the pronouncements from the energy companies in late 2000, we knew utility costs were going to be a big issue for hotel managers in 2001.  The spike in insurance premiums was amplified after September 11 and unfortunately continues to be a concern in 2002," adds Woodworth.

Interest Coverage

With profits off 19.4 percent, the ability of some hotels to cover their interest payments was challenged.  A special analysis of 562 hotels in the PKF survey sample finds that 25.6 percent were unable to generate sufficient cash from their operations (after capital reserve) to cover their 2001 interest payment obligations.  This represents a 38.5 percent increase from the number of properties unable to pay their interest in 2000.  "While this is certainly a significant increase, it could have been more pronounced had the interest payments not been reduced by an average of 8.4 percent," says Woodworth.  "The reduction in interest paid can be attributed to workouts, re-financing, and some degree of lender forgiveness."  A total of 78.1 percent of the properties in the survey sample reported a decline in their interest payment from 2000 to 2001.

On average, full-service hotels were able to cover their interest payments in 2001 at a coverage ratio of 2.01.  This was down from 2.31 in 2000.  For limited-service hotels, the interest payment coverage ratio dropped from 1.97 in 2000 to 1.84 in 2001.  "Given the more stringent lending requirements of the 1990s, the higher contribution of equity, and a realistic understanding by the lending community of the current options for hotel real estate, we have seen far fewer bankruptcies and foreclosures during this industry recession as compared to the early 1990s," Woodworth says.

The Importance of Benchmarking

Given the projected declines in revenue, the ability to control costs will once again be a primary focus of management in 2002.  "Many current hotel owners and managers are new to the industry and have never experienced operating in a recession.  They are asking us to assist them monitor expenses and profits in an environment of declining revenues," Woodworth notes.

In response to this increased demand for expense and profit data, HRG offers its clients Benchmarker, a service that allows hotel owners and operators to compare the financial performance of their properties against a select group of comparable properties.  Hotel owners and operators interested in HRG's Benchmarking products can contact Claude Vargo at (404) 842-1150, ext 237.
To order a copy of the 2002 edition of Trends in the Hotel Industry, call (404) 842-1150, ext 223.

The Hospitality Research Group (HRG), headquartered in Atlanta, is the research affiliate of PKF Consulting, the international consulting and real estate firm specializing in the hospitality industry.  HRG, along with PKF Consulting and the PKF Consulting Capital Markets Group, are wholly owned subsidiaries of Hospitality Asset Advisors International, a U.S.  Corporation.  HAA International has offices in New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Washington DC, Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Singapore.

Source Contact details:

Gary Carr
Director of Communications
PKF Consulting
425 California Street
Suite 1650
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 421-5378
gary.carr@pkfc.com

Mark Woodworth 
Executive Managing Director 
The Hospitality Research Group 
3340 Peachtree Road  Suite 580
Atlanta, GA  30326  
(404) 842-1150
 

HVS INTERNATIONAL/NYU PRESENT 2002 MANHATTAN HOTEL SURVEY

Our research and findings indicate that in 2001, the Manhattan lodging market experienced a decline in operating performance prior to September, due primarily to a softening national economy; the terrorist attacks of September 11th further accelerated this decline. However, we forecast that by 2005, occupancy in Manhattan will reach 1999 levels and average rate will achieve 2000 levels.

Operating History In 2001, the Manhattan lodging market experienced decreased performance levels for the first time in nine years, primarily due to the impact of the national economic downturn, which was compounded by a significant increase in supply, a softening in demand, and the September 11th terrorist attacks. However, we expect the Manhattan lodging market to recover by the beginning of 2003.

According to data provided by Smith Travel Research (STR), a 9.7% decrease in demand and an 11.4% drop in average rate between 2000 and 2001 resulted in a 22.3% decline in marketwide revenue per available room (RevPAR) during the same period. However, during the longer term historical period of 1988 to 2001, Manhattan lodging demand rose at an average annual compounded rate of 0.8%, while average rate and RevPAR increased by 4.0% and 3.3%, respectively. Although the national economy stumbled during 2001, most economic indicators for the New York metropolitan area (including employment levels, retail sales, population trends, office vacancy rates, and trade statistics) suggest further growth in the middle- and long-term future.

As such, we anticipate a recovery from the economic downturn by the beginning of 2003, and we believe that demand and occupancy levels in 2003 and beyond will be dictated by normal economic influences and the interaction of supply and demand. Based on the data from STR, 10,303 new rooms became available in Manhattan between 1988 and 2001. As indicated in the following table, the bulk of these rooms entered the market in two distinct cycles: 3,425 rooms entered the market between 1989 and 1992, and 5,511 rooms were added between 1997 and 2001. In 2001, the amount of available rooms citywide increased significantly, tremendously impacting the entire Manhattan hotel market; during this period, the market was trying to absorb 1,711 new rooms, while demand was declining as a result of the economic slowdown. 

It is notable that between 1992 and 1995, supply rose by only 534 rooms, down considerably from the rapid expansion experienced between 1989 and 1992. Additionally, despite the remarkable strength of the market between 1995 and 1998, only 1,705 new rooms became available. Conversely, 1,660 new rooms entered the market in 1999, followed by 1,573 new rooms in 2000, and 1,711 in 2001; these annual room supply increases were the highest experienced in Manhattan since 1990.

New Supply In 2001, eight new hotels opened in Manhattan, resulting in a 2.8% marketwide room supply increase, despite the fact that four hotels (representing approximately 3.8% of the city's lodging supply) were damaged or destroyed by the September 11th terrorist attacks. While Manhattan is often seen as a collection of neighborhoods, the impact of these new rooms has been felt citywide. Four new hotels, totaling 733 rooms, entered the Manhattan market in the first half of 2002.

Three additional lodging facilities encompassing a total of 1,004 rooms are anticipated to open by the end of 2002, bringing the total new supply for this year to 1,737 rooms; this translates to a 1.5% supply increase over 2001. The opening of the 860-room Westin in Times Square will account for approximately half of the new supply entering the market in 2002. The Westin will be the largest addition to the city's supply of first- class, convention-oriented hotels since the Crowne Plaza Times Square opened in 1991. 

This additional supply is expected to further affect the city's declining average daily rate and occupancy percentage. Approximately 70% of the city's new supply will be located in the Manhattan's Midtown West neighborhood, with 17% in Midtown East, and 13% Downtown. 

Manhattan Operating Statistics HVS International compiled data provided by HotelRevMAX, a New York-based hotel performance data company, to illustrate the effects of the September 11th terrorist attacks on different classes of hotels in Manhattan. The following table compares the performance of a representative sample of Manhattan hotels for January through August and September through December, as well as year-end figures for both 2000 and 2001; results are broken down by market segment: boutique, first-class, luxury, and tourist. In the boutique market segment, supply increased at 38.0% (550,714 rooms) between 2000 and 2001, posting a 41.0% increase (383,373 rooms) prior to September, 2001, and a 32.7% increase (167,341 rooms) during the last four months of the year.

During the same respective periods, demand in this segment increased by 24.2% and 12.0% over the corresponding periods of the previous year. We note that only the first-class market segment registered an overall decline in room supply between 2000 and 2001, at -2.3%. This decrease can be attributed to the closings of the Embassy Suites Battery Park, the Millennium Hilton, the Marriott Financial Center, and the Marriott World Trade Center following the September 11th terrorist attacks. 

We note that while both the Marriott Financial Center (January, 2002) and the Embassy Suites Battery Park (May, 2002) have since reopened, the Marriott Financial Center was completely destroyed in the attacks; as of the time of this survey, no definite plans had been set for this property.

Additionally, the currently closed Millennium Hilton will reportedly re-open sometime in the future, after undergoing extensive renovations. As a result of the economic slowdown and an influx of new supply, all four segments registered decreases in occupancy, average rates, and RevPAR from January through August of 2001 compared to the same period of 2000. The tragic events of September 11, 2001, further challenged Manhattan's lodging industry, causing steeper declines across all segments. 

We note that the untimely attacks occurred at the beginning of Manhattan's peak season, negatively impacting the performance of the city's lodging industry. The boutique segment felt the greatest impact of the economic downturn and the substantial increase in supply, with a 16.7% decrease in RevPAR prior to September of 2001 compared to the same period of 2000. On a full-year basis, the boutique segment also registered the largest RevPAR decline in 2001, dropping by 25.6% over the previous year.


HOTELS, RESTAURANTS TURNING TO CHIC RESTROOMS

P.S. -- the food is great but be sure to
check out the bathrooms

The Miami Herald  -   From MTV music videos playing above urinals to fish tanks separating the sexes, off-the-stall restrooms are all the rage in restaurants, clubs and hotels across South Florida. 

Need to go? Learn another language, have your feet massaged, catch a show or be the show while answering nature's call. 

Trendy toilets can make the business at hand a more memorable and enjoyable experience, said Michele Merlo, president of South Beach's Pelican Hotel. The Italian fashion gurus who founded the Diesel clothing line also created the Pelican. 

They have turned the washroom into the watch room, with four seven-inch color television screens built into the wall directly above the urinals. 

Often on the toilet tube: the Fishing Channel. The cable station offers a lesson in fly fishing while visitors zip their fly. 

"The bathroom is always a weird place for men. It can be embarrassing," Merlo said. "We give you something else to look at instead of your neighbor." The ode to the commode is allowing designers around the country to relieve themselves -- artistically -- in the loo, said Michael Adams, editor of Hospitality Design Magazine. 

"More and more, bathrooms are becoming a place for designers to flex their creative muscles," he said. "It's one of the last places left that designers can try and get attention for their work. 

It's sort of like a P.S. -- the food is great but be sure to also check out the bathrooms." It can also be good for business, say the folks at Sloan's ice cream parlor in Boca Raton and West Palm Beach. 

Like a storefront window, everything is on display behind the glass-doored restroom -- until you turn the door latch. Within seconds, the glass fogs up and becomes opaque to give the user privacy. 

Owner Sloan Kamenstein saw the trick door used in a New York conference room and had the glass company fly south to install it for $15,000 a bathroom. His Boca location has one and the West Palm Beach site has two. 

"It's a lot of money, but it's paid for itself already," said Kamenstein. "People come in just to see the toilet and end up buying ice cream." Danger: Do not forget to lock the door. The consequences are, well, a peep show. Starring you. 

"We've had a lot of people who didn't realize they needed to lock it. You try to look the other way and pretend you don't notice," said Kamenstein. "Bathrooms can be so boring. We wanted to have a little fun with ours. We wanted it to be over the top." And so it is, according to the Travel Channel. The network has just named Sloan's powder room to its list of "Best Bathrooms in the World." Especially in vogue: desegregation. The owners of some public facilities are daring to go nongender specific. 

"We have television to thank for breaking down those barriers," Adams said. 

The la Ally McBeal unisex phenomenon has spread to Lincoln Road's Rumi lounge and restaurant in Miami Beach. There, the high-end restroom is shared by men and women alike. 

Rumi's neighbor, Balans restaurant, has been known to give the full-bladdered stage fright. 

Balans' revealing restroom projects a user's shadow on the bathroom's surrounding wall. Those waiting in line outside can see the silhouette of the person squatting, sitting or standing as they use the toilet. 

"Some people will use the handicapped ones downstairs instead," said owner Paul Prodromou. 

At Romano's Macaroni Grill, the longer it takes to go, the better your Italian gets. The restaurant chain offers Italian lessons for beginners in its bathrooms. 

Servizo incluso? Is the tip included? Tavola per due, prego. A table for two, please. 

The women's restroom at the Forge in Miami Beach is fowl: an air-conditioned bird cage with live lovebirds and finches. The popular attraction sometimes leads women to drag their dates into the lounge. 

The best seat in the house at Liquid night club is in its saltwater closet, many male clubgoers said. 

There lies the answer to the often pondered question: what do women do in there? 

"Every guy has this fantasy of finding out what's going on in the girls bathroom. Why do women go in pairs and take forever?" said Dwayne Parker, a partner in Bad Boys Unlimited -- the clothing, club and music outfit that owns Liquid. 

Above the mirror in Liquid's ladies room is a massive saltwater tank that adjoins the men's bathroom. The view, as men are using the urinals, is of the women's bathroom. It works both ways: women can also see into the men's room. 

Although there are no signs posted telling folks they may be watched, because the view is of the public area of the bathroom, there is no expectation of privacy. Hence, legal voyeurism. 

"It's reality TV without the set," Parker said. "Most women don't know the men are watching." The unsuspecting women wash their hands, reach into their blouses and adjust their cleavage. They check their teeth for lunch leftovers. They put on their mirror face while puckering up for fresh lipstick. They tease and flip their hair while admiring their own good looks. 

It's the kind of stuff that's taken care of when no one's looking -- at least no one of the opposite sex. 

Oops. 

"Guys love it," said Liquid regular Javi Prado of Kendall. "You get to look at girls where you're traditionally not supposed to be looking."   

WYNDHAM OFFERS FREE CALLS FOR SOME  - A RARE MOVE IN HOTEL INDUSTRY

 
USA Today  -  Starting today, Wyndham International hotels eliminate phone charges for its best business customers.

The radical shift in an industry best known for adding charges addresses "the single biggest complaint" from customers, says Fred Kleisner, CEO of the upscale hotel chain that operates about 200 hotels and resorts.

Members of Wyndham's ByRequest program can make free, unlimited local and domestic long-distance calls (excluding calls to Alaska and Hawaii), and fax, make copies and surf the Internet free. Wyndham says room rates will not increase.

Wyndham won't say how much revenue it expects to lose because of its new policy, but its timing might be just right.

More travelers are avoiding hotel phone charges by using cellphones, says Robert Mandelbaum, of PKF Consulting in Atlanta, which advises hotels. Hotel revenue from phone services fell 21% last year from 2000, vs. a 10% drop in hotel revenue overall, he says.

Phone charges make up 3% to 4% of the average guest bill.

Mark Williams, travel director of PricewaterhouseCoopers, says Wyndham's policy could save his company $ 1 million a year.

"There's a lot of noise about the add-on charges on hotel bills, and this could quiet it for some time," he says.

About the only consistency in hotel phone charges now is that most chains charge something:

* Marriott hotels charge $ 9.95 for 24 hours of high-speed Internet access.

* Hiltons bill 50 cents to $ 1.25 for each local call up to 60 minutes. Calls exceeding 60 minutes are charged an extra 10 cents a minute.

* Ritz-Carlton hotels charge75 cents to $ 1 for local calls. There is no charge for toll-free or credit card calls within the USA.

Wyndham's current ByRequest members automatically receive the free phone benefits. New members must enroll in the free program before Sept. 30 and stay at a Wyndham property before that date to be eligible.

"As we recover from last year and as business bounces back, we hope to attract more business travelers," Kleisner says.

Christopher Elliott, travel writer and commentator, says he doesn't expect other hotel chains to offer free long-distance anytime soon. When the economy rebounds, he says, hotels likely will add charges to bills and revoke free offers.

CHINA RELEASES NEW REGULATIONS ON OVERSEAS TOURISM EFFECTIVE JULY 1
 
Text of report in English by official Chinese news agency Xinhua (New China News Agency)

BBC Worldwide Monitoring    -   China released Monday a new regulation governing Chinese tourists travelling abroad, which will go into effect on 1 July.

The 33-article regulation stipulates that foreign tourism destination countries should be decided by China's tourism authorities with the approval of the State Council, China's cabinet.

About 20 destination countries have been selected, including major member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Egypt and Turkey.

The rule also stipulates that travel agencies providing foreign tourism services should meet the following requirements:

- Agency must have held international travel service qualifications for at least one year.

- Agencies should have achieved outstanding accomplishments in organizing visits of foreign tourists to China.

- And such agencies must not have been involved in any major unlawful practices or had serious problems in service quality.

The regulation also requires travel agencies to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of tourists.

When providing foreign tourism service, organizing travel agencies should sign contracts with tourists, which include travel itineraries, prices, food, accommodations, transportation as well as their responsibilities in case of breach of contract.

 

  Free discounts at the best restaurants in town!